<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fashion and Clothing &#187; synthetic stone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tam-aze.com/tag/synthetic-stone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tam-aze.com</link>
	<description>Fashion and Clothing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:07:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Choosing Between Moissanite And Diamonds For Rings</title>
		<link>http://www.tam-aze.com/choosing-between-moissanite-and-diamonds-for-rings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tam-aze.com/choosing-between-moissanite-and-diamonds-for-rings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diamond rings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skin care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetic stone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tam-aze.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diamond rings have long been considered the ultimate standard in fashionable rings. This is especially true for certain occasions like engagements or anniversaries. Is there any merit in looking into a diamond alternative?
The main negative of moissanite is that it&#8217;s always a synthetic stone, no matter how large or small. This means that no moissanite [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diamond rings have long been considered the ultimate standard in fashionable rings. This is especially true for certain occasions like engagements or anniversaries. Is there any merit in looking into a diamond alternative?</p>
<p>The main negative of moissanite is that it&#8217;s always a synthetic stone, no matter how large or small. This means that no moissanite ring can claim the natural beauty and grace that diamond rings can. If synthetic gems are a deal breaker, don&#8217;t consider moissanite.</p>
<p>In terms of beauty, moissanite rings are very comparable to diamond ones. Moissanite weighs less, and gemologists claim that they display greater fire, brilliance and luster than diamonds. They don&#8217;t have the glamor and reputation that diamonds do, though.</p>
<p>One of the best things about a moissanite ring is that they&#8217;re relatively inexpensive. This is partially because they&#8217;re synthetic, and partially because diamonds of high quality tend to be exceptionally expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tam-aze.com/choosing-between-moissanite-and-diamonds-for-rings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
